Thursday, February 11, 2010

How could this happen... Why Greece... A hypothesis.



So everyone's all concerned about things blowing up, and it always acts as a great shock to people who trust the official statistics that normally say everything's fine (because it's not in the interests of anyone in power to report otherwise). This leads in large part to conspiracy-theory thinking, the "someone's evil" reflex of caveman-thinkers (who, in that much simpler time, were correct nine times out of ten); but we're supposedly more enlightened folks who can address the symptoms of systems that're out of whack: hence my simple hypothesis -- whether we're talking about banks, corporations or countries, those entities with the largest ratio of hidden to declared liabilities die first. In the corporate world, the financially "innovative" behemoth, Enron, who first figured out how to hide their indebtedness behind SIVs (which earned their CFO "CFO of the Year") was the first to go. Similarly, tiny Greece, with 1/4 of its population working for the government and, as a result, very little economy to speak of, has plunged first in the looming sovereign debt crisis saga. If my hypothesis is correct, then before looking at Italy (one of the so-called "PIIGS"), expect France to hit the rails first.

The fix for this, of course, since most of the net liabilities in all these nations are in social spending like pensions, health-care, &c., is to either reduce these liabilities or else to declare them and curtail current spending appropriately. These two forms of political suicide, "betrayal of trust" and "austerity measures" are such a Scylla and Charybdis for politicians that I suspect we'll get to see if my hypothesis is correct.

Friday, February 05, 2010

Government statistics at their finest

So the jobs print came out: we lost an additional 60,000 jobs in January, which meant that unemployment dropped from 10% to 9.7%.

Anyone who thinks the state should be in charge of people's lives should contemplate that stat (released to great fanfare, no less). Instead of mailing tea-bags, if we could just get the bureaucrats to use real data instead of the output of models, we'd be a lot better off (and drink more tea).

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Keynes versus Hayek



Pretty obvious which I favor... :D


Friday, January 22, 2010

The Supremes do something good

I'm very happy about the decision this past week by SCOTUS to open the floodgates of corporations and, to a lesser extent, unions to run as many campaign adverts as they please. The reason I'm a fan is because, in the name of cleaning up elections, what's been done is that the two political factions have centralized control of campaign financing to an extent never before heard of -- if you're a state-level representative, up until this decision by SCOTUS, you'd better be kowtow'ing to the party line in DC or else your rivals in the primary would take all the available financing money. This has led to the recent increase in our already venemously partisan governance. By giving politicians someone else to go out to, hat in hand, besides just the party committees, we'll get better governance.

There's a counter-argument that party committees are limited in the amount they can donate: that's true, but they work around that fact by having party committees from all over the country write the checks, multiplying the limit by the number of local committees available, thus being the only source of "big pocket" funds.

This decision will help moderate candidates, in spite of the histrionics on the radio, and I'm very happy with it.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Great Infografic

From Visual Economics. The upper-right corner's the real kicker.







Blog Archive