Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Vérinage

Apparently the French have been demolishing buildings 9/11-style (sans aircraft) for quite a long time and consider it a standard demo technique, called "vérinage". The general idea is that the weight of the top portion of the building, even though it can be supported by the building, contains such a massive amount of potential energy that once it's fallen a story or two it can easily sheer through any and all support beneath it.

To my uneducated eye this looks exactly like the World Trade Center's collapse, especially in the three aspects of

  1. Massive ejection of dust & debris
  2. Near free-fall appearance ("near" because if you can eyeball the difference between a 9.8 m/s*s fall and an 9.0 m/s*s fall, you're a better man than I)
  3. Sheer vertical collapse similar to standard U.S. explosives-based demolition.

While I cannot declare with absolute certainty that the twin towers falling was the work of physics and not a nefarious plot by an evil vice-president and his secret legion of freedom-hating evil-doers, it's good enough for me.     :D


"A compilation of demolitions conducted using the French demolition technique of vérinage. This is achieved with hydraulics that push structural members out of alignment, allowing the top portion of a building to then demolish the structure below via gravity alone, without the use of explosives. Note that the collapses are rapid and produce copious dust."

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Assuming you wish to learn more about the actual mechanics that let to WTC failure - check this link out:
http://wtc.nist.gov/

Part of what you talk about here did occur, but what really led to everything was the following.
1) Aircraft impacted causing damage, but structure did not fail.
2) Fuel release from flaming aircraft caused massive pool fire (very large heat release)
3) Large pool fire ignited everything else in the office suite - an even larger fuel load - leading to very very large heat release.
4) Now massive fire began to cause structural steel to weaken and fail, thus leading roughly to Verinage that you link to here.

There were other factors - but it was fire that caused the whole thing, not the impact.

JimDesu said...

Understood: I just meant the mechanism by which the collapse occured -- I've had folks insist that the structural failure just couldn't lead to a straight-down fall.

Madeleine said...

Wow. I don't have anything constructive to say, except that Verinage is neat!

Mike said...

I agree with Maddie. I like the explosions though, tipping is fun, blowing up is just...

so much cooler.

Blog Archive